SIPLOCK. “Changing the building Paradigm”
SIPLOCK Forever
Net-Zero, Green & LEED Design
Dried-In Siplock Shell.
FAQ.
1. What is a dried-in building shell?
A dried-in shell consists of Siplock panels, structural steel columns, steel ridge assembly and steel I-Beams ready for the floor assembly.
Siplock design, lead and shipment times are generally 4-8 weeks.
Siplock is designed to meet local and state code requirements.
A Siplock construction crew erects a Siplock building.
Example: A three story 3000 square foot building shell, with a gabled roof, two levels of floor beams, set on slab grade can be dried-in in about 5 days.
2. What is the cost of a dried-in shell?
A Siplock building consists of 9” R38 wall panels and 11” R46 Roof panels. Each panels “R” value is continuous throughout the entire length of the panel. (Up to 52 Ft in length.).
No thermal bridging in a panel.
Save on overall construction costs and offer more! How!
a. No additional insulation and contractor costs for insulation. R38 & R46 Insulation is part of the SIP building panel.
b. No headers, lintel or framing required for windows and doors. Eliminates added framing costs and most importantly, no thermal bridging from window and door headers and framing.
c. No house wrap necessary, 26 gauge steel skin panels (both sides) flash each other to insure a tight weather and moisture resistant seal.
d. No roof and soffit vents required. No additional materials and carpenter costs and more importantly, no air leakage from vents. No vents insure that hurricane force winds will not diminish the buildings structural integrity.
e. No waste with pre-sized SIP panels. Minimal trash hauling, lower security and safety issues with trade workers. Panels are straight, true, plumb and will not twist, warp, bend and deteriorate because of moisture.
f. Reduced insurance costs. Shell buildings are put up in less than a week.
Interior and exterior trades can start work side by side in less than a week. No trade’s gridlock. No scheduling issues. Work commencement by the building trades is reduced to a common start date by all.
g. Open floor plan for no obstruction vaulted ceilings and views. No interior bearing wall or support columns in great rooms or any other rooms. Reduced construction costs for the popular open floor designs.
h. These savings translate to a sizeable reduction in the cost of construction materials, labor, hauling costs and insurance.
i. Steel construction, energy zero, green, clean air and noise reduction design are features customers want. j. Siplock costs less than other energy zero construction methods.
Continued:
The following example provides a fair comparison of material and labor costs of a conventional stick built wall and a SIP wall.
Comparison costs of a 576 sq. ft. wall assembly or about 72 running feet of 8 ft. wall.
We can draw two important conclusions from this data.
Finally: The small increase in the cost of a SIP wall is more than offset by savings in the following:
3. What about plumbing and electricity.
Or
4. What about roofing and siding.
5. What about energy saving mechanicals.
For Carter Scott, heating a house measuring 1,700 to 2,000 square feet with two ductless mini-splits is no longer an experimental method. It’s standard operating procedure — one he’s used on 18 houses.
Carter Scott was one of the first builders bold enough to build a cold-climate home heated by only two ductless mini-split units (one in the downstairs living room, and one in the upstairs hallway). Skeptics predicted that the unheated bedrooms would be cold and uncomfortable. Yet Scott was confident that the home’s excellent thermal envelope — with high-R walls, triple-glazed windows, and low levels of air leakage — would keep the homeowners comfortable even when the bedroom doors were closed.
Scott owns a construction company called Transformations in Townsend, Massachusetts. He built his pioneering two-mini-split house in Townsend in 2008.
6. What are some cost saving examples?
In an independent energy survey, according to the Structural Insulated Panel Association (SIPA), an 180,000 SF senior living facility in Florida is saving thousands of dollars each month. HVAC costs have been verified at $0.025 (2 ½ cents) per SF.
A 28,000 SF residence has recorded HVAC costs of $0.018 (1.8 cents) SF.
A passive house could expect to use about 1.36KWh per square foot of HVAC conditioned space per year.
Reference: http://www.passivehouse-international.org/upload/ipha-brochure/
In Florida, for example a Siplock Energy Star rated 2700 sq. ft. home could consume about .42 Kw per hour for HVAC, you could expect about a $25 monthly cost for HVAC.
2011 Florida Electric average rate is 12 cents per KWh.
A similar home in NY would be about $65 monthly for heating and cooling.
The cost of electricity by state. (2011)
http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/10/27/141766341/the-price-of-electricity-in-your-state
7. What other considerations are needed for your new Siplock construction.
8. Customer responsibilities include.